opit

May 28
Permalink

So the ideal social network (from an investor’s point of view) is one that presents itself as being free-to-use, is highly addictive, uses you as bait to trap your friends, tracks you everywhere you go on the internet, sells your personal information to the highest bidder, and is impossible to opt out of.

Sounds like a cross between your friendly neighbourhood heroin pusher, Amway, and a really creepy stalker, doesn’t it?

May 27
Permalink

Essentially, this kind of “hacking” is all about trying to make the best of:

— something that is handed to you without your necessarily asking for it,

— and designed by someone else for someone else’s benefit.

May 26
Permalink
Several physicists weigh in on what would happen if you were to place your hand in the proton stream of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
Permalink
These results provide further confirmation of the acceptability of the simple cylindrically symmetrical body models employed in these studies to represent the average Japanese survivor.
Permalink
One technical problem was that buried objects—especially during winter—can get very cold, and it was possible the mine would not have worked after some days underground, due to the electronics being too cold to operate properly. Various methods to get around this were studied, such as wrapping the bombs in insulating blankets. One particularly remarkable proposal suggested that live chickens should be included in the mechanism. The chickens would be sealed inside the casing, with a supply of food and water; they would remain alive for a week or so. The body heat given off by the chickens would, it seems, have been sufficient to keep all the relevant components at a working temperature.
Permalink
A grizzled NASA veteran once told me that the Apollo moon landings were communism’s greatest achievement.
Permalink

But electric kilns have the reputation of producing mediocre work and it certainly can be easily done. Here’s how: First choose a commercial glaze because it looks nice in their literature or on their test tiles. Now don’t get me wrong — there are some very attractive commercial glazes out there. There are also some terrible ones. But that is not my point here. My point is that with a commercial glaze you don’t know what to do when something changes or goes wrong.

Suppose, for example, you change clay bodies and the glaze you are using crazes on the new body (or even worse, shivers). What do you do? You don’t know the composition so you have no idea how you might modify the glaze to fix the problem without changing its aesthetics.

May 25
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink

you’ll soon find yourself on the other side of the mysterious time portal, enclosed in a concrete stairwell and surrounded by original Nazi-era signage bearing strange phrases like “Männer Abort”.

“It means Men’s Toilet,” explains Dominic, our affable, jocular guide, in near-perfect English. “The Nazis were not keen on using the French word toilette, nor the Anglo-American word WC, for obvious reasons. There was no German word, aside from Scheisse-Haus, which would have been too long to put on the walls. So they dug up this strange, archaic word, Abort”.

May 24
Permalink
If we can figure out a way of putting a probe through [Europa’s] ice — and the ice may be hundreds of yards thick, it could be very difficult to do this — but if we could put a probe down that could melt its way through the ice, and then send out little submarines, who know what we could find down there. It would be fascinating to go look. I think we have no choice but to go look. We must do it.

except that they won’t :( as NASA backed out from the JUICE mission.

There’s more water on Jupiter’s moon Europa than there is on Earth

Permalink
I think cyberpunk and the Singularity are only two of the three recent SF breakthroughs. You mentioned the third, and most important, one: whatever it is Bruce Sterling does. I think we’re calling it The New Aesthetic now, but it first appeared (to my limited knowledge) with Gibson’s Count Zero.
Permalink
What usually gets me excited is seeing science fiction that extrapolates from existing physics and sets a story in a setting that winds up exposing that physics. E.g., Glasshouse was fun because an adventure occurred in a world that you imagined essentially (IIRC, it’s been a long time since I read it) on the skeleton of a brown-dwarf-based civilization. Similarly with Iron Sunrise. Stephenson’s Anathem works so well because he manages to wrap a story around the notion of causal domain separation. This is the kind of fiction that really gets me going.
Permalink
We used to read SF to get the heady high of a big vision, the “eyeball kick” as Rudy Rucker describes it, of seeing something brain-warpingly different and new for the first time. But today you don’t need to read SF to get a sense of wonder high: you can just browse “New Scientist”. We’re living in the frickin’ 21st century. Killer robot drones are assassinating people in the hills of Afghanistan. Our civilisation has been invaded and conquered by the hive intelligences of multinational corporations, directed by the new aristocracy of the 0.1%. There are space probes in orbit around Saturn and en route to Pluto. Surgeons are carrying out face transplants. I have more computing power and data storage in my office than probably the entire world had in 1980.
Permalink
In fact, in the past 30 years the only truly challenging new concepts to come along were cyberpunk and the singularity. Both of which amount to different attempts within the genre to accommodate the first-order implications of computers and networking as the defining technology of the near future